Topic summary
68% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Transgender Youth results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 1,804 hits . Analysis detected 11,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,592 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (9,015 of 16,562 topics). This Transgender Youth is better (less manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group. Transgender Youth
Topic details
Total words: 9,592
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 18.8% 18.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst