Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Transgender Rights Debate results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 519 hits. Analysis detected 3,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,505 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Transgender Rights Debate is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Transgender Rights Debate
Topic details
Total words: 2,505
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 20.7%20.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.8%13.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.9%14.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos