Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Will Hallowell results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 519 hits . Analysis detected 3,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,505 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Will Hallowell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Will Hallowell
Author details
Total words: 2,505
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 20.7% 20.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.2% 6.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.8% 13.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.9% 14.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.0%, sitewide 26.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 20.7%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst