Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Train Collision results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 70.8% saturation with 293 hits. Analysis detected 810 faulty-reasoning hits from 414 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (441 of 15,772 topics). This Train Collision is worse (more manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group.
Train Collision
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 414
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510097.2% percentile
16.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles414 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 70.8%70.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 20.1%20.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 25.1%25.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.8%18.8%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 11.8%11.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 6.8%6.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 70.8%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 20.1%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos