Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Trading Card Games results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 590 hits. Analysis detected 3,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Trading Card Games is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Trading Card Games
Topic details
Total words: 2,224
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.7%25.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 24.0%24.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.5%26.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos