Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trade Tensions results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 785 hits. Analysis detected 4,509 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (5,516 of 15,781 topics). This Trade Tensions is worse (more manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Trade Tensions
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,144
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 17.3%17.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos