Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Trade Liberalization results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Slippery Slope, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,027 hits. Analysis detected 6,793 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Trade Liberalization is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Trade Liberalization
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Trade Liberalization (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 7,736
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.9%6.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos