Topic summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trade Deadline results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 1,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,661 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,416 of 16,562 topics). This Trade Deadline is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Trade Deadline
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠25%Trade Deadline (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,661
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.9%10.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.0%4.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos