Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video441 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tpusa Halftime Show results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.5% saturation with 404 hits. Analysis detected 2,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,023 of 15,523 topics). This Tpusa Halftime Show is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Tpusa Halftime Show
Topic details
Total words: 1,324
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 30.5%30.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 20.4%20.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.4%11.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.6%Personal Incredulity: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos