Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Toyota Motor Corp results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Pessimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 1,413 hits. Analysis detected 8,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,923 of 16,562 topics). This Toyota Motor Corp is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Toyota Motor Corp
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠83%Toyota Motor Corp (selected)7%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510082.4% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 27.2%27.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 16.9%16.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 17.1%17.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Availability Heuristic: Topic 27.2%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos