Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tornado Aftermath results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 971 hits. Analysis detected 6,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,302 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,950 of 16,445 topics). This Tornado Aftermath is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Tornado Aftermath
Topic details
Total words: 7,302
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.2%10.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos