Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tomi Lahren Is Fearless results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Sunk Cost Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 208 hits. Analysis detected 1,663 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,707 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,506 of 15,882 topics). This Tomi Lahren Is Fearless is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Tomi Lahren Is Fearless
Topic details
Total words: 1,707
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.0% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 9.0%9.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 0.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos