Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Tom Brady results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 926 hits . Analysis detected 3,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,171 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,689 topics). This Tom Brady is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Tom Brady
Topic details
Total words: 5,171
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst