Topic summary
63% 2 analyzed articles/videos 777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tokenization results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 819 hits . Analysis detected 6,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,427 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 58% (7,069 of 16,562 topics). This Tokenization is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group. Tokenization
Topic details
Total words: 5,427
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.3% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 15.1% 15.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst