Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tls results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 481 hits. Analysis detected 3,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (15,690 of 15,886 topics). This Tls is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Tls
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,648
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

1% percentile
02550751001.2% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos