Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos704 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiny Desk results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 424 hits. Analysis detected 3,055 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,518 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,404 of 16,562 topics). This Tiny Desk is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Tiny Desk
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,518
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
4.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.8%16.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 16.5%16.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos