Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitra I. Arthur results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 218 hits. Analysis detected 1,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,913 of 6,628 authors). This Mitra I. Arthur is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
Mitra I. Arthur
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
72%Mitra I. Arthur (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,624
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510071.1% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.4%13.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos