Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitra I. Arthur results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 218 hits . Analysis detected 1,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,913 of 6,628 authors). This Mitra I. Arthur is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Mitra I. Arthur
Author details
Total words: 1,624
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.1% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.4% 13.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst