Topic summary
⁠47%3 analyzed articles/videos1,425 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiktok Trends results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 635 hits. Analysis detected 5,983 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,810 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,649 of 16,562 topics). This Tiktok Trends is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Tiktok Trends
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠36%Tiktok Trends (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 6,810
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos