Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tiktok Feud results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 629 hits. Analysis detected 3,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,781 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Tiktok Feud is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Tiktok Feud
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,781
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.2%14.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.7%7.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.2%21.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Horn Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos