Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ticketing Market results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 369 hits. Analysis detected 2,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,332 of 16,562 topics). This Ticketing Market is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Ticketing Market
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,660
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.4%7.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos