Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tick Borne Illness Prevention results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 1,136 hits. Analysis detected 3,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,955 of 16,562 topics). This Tick Borne Illness Prevention is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Tick Borne Illness Prevention
Topic details
Total words: 4,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 23.2%23.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos