Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,354 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Kean Jr results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 1,544 hits. Analysis detected 8,299 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,414 of 16,562 topics). This Thomas Kean Jr is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Thomas Kean Jr
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠68%Thomas Kean Jr (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.3% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.5%28.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.2%11.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.6%18.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos