Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video422 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Third Party Politics results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Recency Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 257 hits. Analysis detected 1,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,993 of 16,562 topics). This Third Party Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Third Party Politics
Topic details
Total words: 1,688
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos