Topic summary
⁠26%2 analyzed articles/videos2,287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thermostat Settings results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,146 hits. Analysis detected 4,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (18,520 of 22,543 topics). This Thermostat Settings is better (less manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group.
Thermostat Settings
Topic details
Total words: 9,148
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510017.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 12.5%12.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos