Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,934 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Vampire Lestat results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 2,592 hits. Analysis detected 10,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,748 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,269 of 16,562 topics). This The Vampire Lestat is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
The Vampire Lestat
Topic details
Total words: 11,748
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.1%22.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.0%0.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos