Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,181 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Social Order results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 710 hits. Analysis detected 5,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,527 of 16,562 topics). This The Social Order is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
The Social Order
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,724
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.0%15.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos