Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These The New York Times results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 460 hits. Analysis detected 4,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This The New York Times is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
The New York Times
Topic details
Total words: 2,576
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.0%13.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.8%10.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.4%8.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos