Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video958 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Hamptons results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.3% saturation with 1,182 hits. Analysis detected 5,584 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,109 of 16,562 topics). This The Hamptons is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
The Hamptons
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠88%The Hamptons (selected)8%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,860
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.3% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 41.3%41.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 33.0%33.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.3%19.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 16.2%16.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 41.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 33.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.6%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos