Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video451 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Fed results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 49.6% saturation with 671 hits. Analysis detected 3,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,353 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.2% and a BS Rank of 97% (598 of 16,562 topics). This The Fed is worse (more manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group.
The Fed
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,353
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510096.4% percentile
14.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 48.9%48.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 34.7%34.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 49.6%49.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 22.8%22.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 19.8%19.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 16.0%16.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 16.5%16.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.0%18.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 49.6%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 48.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 34.7%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Special Pleading: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos