Topic summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 1,329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Catcher In The Rye results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 637 hits . Analysis detected 5,138 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,987 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 68% (5,427 of 16,562 topics). This The Catcher In The Rye is worse (more manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group. The Catcher In The Rye
Topic details
Total words: 3,987
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.2% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 16.0% 16.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.4% 7.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst