Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Bachelorette results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 531 hits. Analysis detected 2,754 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,814 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,660 of 16,562 topics). This The Bachelorette is worse (more manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
The Bachelorette
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,814
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.8% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 18.9%18.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos