Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Age Of Extinction results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 294 hits. Analysis detected 2,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,240 of 16,562 topics). This The Age Of Extinction is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
The Age Of Extinction
Topic details
Total words: 3,260
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos