Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Douwe den Held results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 294 hits . Analysis detected 2,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,996 of 6,628 authors). This Douwe den Held is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. Douwe den Held
Author details
Total words: 3,260
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.6% 2.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst