Topic summary
⁠19%4 analyzed articles/videos775 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thailand results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 447 hits. Analysis detected 4,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,391 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (11,506 of 15,447 topics). This Thailand is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Thailand
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos