Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Teyana Taylor results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 413 hits. Analysis detected 1,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Teyana Taylor is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Teyana Taylor
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,088
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 19.8%19.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos