Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Njera Perkins results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 413 hits . Analysis detected 1,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Njera Perkins is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Njera Perkins
Author details
Total words: 2,088
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 19.8% 19.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 19.8%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst