Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Energy Sector results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 468 hits. Analysis detected 2,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,751 of 15,778 topics). This Texas Energy Sector is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Texas Energy Sector
Topic details
Total words: 2,520
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 18.6%18.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.7%14.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos