Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Court Cases results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 377 hits. Analysis detected 3,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (2,859 of 15,690 topics). This Texas Court Cases is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Texas Court Cases
Topic details
Total words: 1,568
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 24.0%24.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.2%19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.1%10.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.9%13.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos