Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Test Screenings results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hindsight Bias , and Anecdotal , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 401 hits . Analysis detected 1,950 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 59% (6,898 of 16,562 topics). This Test Screenings is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Test Screenings
Topic details
Total words: 1,904
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.4% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 21.1% 21.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst