Topic summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Terrorism Funding results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 410 hits. Analysis detected 1,599 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,799 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (7,733 of 15,527 topics). This Terrorism Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Terrorism Funding
Topic details
Total words: 2,799
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.2%14.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos