Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Terror Attack results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 318 hits. Analysis detected 2,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,680 of 16,130 topics). This Terror Attack is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Terror Attack
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,996
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.9%15.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos