Topic summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos1,913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Territorial Disputes results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 1,104 hits. Analysis detected 5,895 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,385 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,391 of 16,562 topics). This Territorial Disputes is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Territorial Disputes
Topic details
Total words: 6,385
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos