Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video679 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Territorial Claims results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,597 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,651 of 16,562 topics). This Territorial Claims is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Territorial Claims
Topic details
Total words: 2,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos