Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos4,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Television Series results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 2,370 hits. Analysis detected 16,935 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,022 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (12,758 of 15,447 topics). This Television Series is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Television Series
Topic details
Total words: 23,022
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles23K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos