Topic summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Television Review results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 721 hits. Analysis detected 3,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,136 of 16,562 topics). This Television Review is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Television Review
Topic details
Total words: 3,036
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.0% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.8%23.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.6%9.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos