Topic summary
⁠5%2 analyzed articles/videos1,189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Television Actors results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 336 hits. Analysis detected 1,930 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,756 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,372 of 16,562 topics). This Television Actors is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Television Actors
Topic details
Total words: 4,756
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510013.2% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos