Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Telemundo St Louis results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 1,195 hits. Analysis detected 5,744 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,553 of 16,562 topics). This Telemundo St Louis is worse (more manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group.
Telemundo St Louis
Topic details
Total words: 3,596
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.6% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 33.2%33.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.4%15.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.5%10.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 33.2%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos