Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video967 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tectonic Plates results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 316 hits. Analysis detected 2,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,349 of 16,562 topics). This Tectonic Plates is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Tectonic Plates
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.0%2.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos