Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 967 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sylvain Barbot results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 316 hits . Analysis detected 2,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (4,059 of 6,628 authors). This Sylvain Barbot is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group. Sylvain Barbot
Author details
Total words: 3,868
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.0% 2.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst