Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Technology In Policing results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 1,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,227 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Technology In Policing is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Technology In Policing
Topic details
Total words: 1,227
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.2%13.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.6%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos